Late-Night Eating as a Cue Problem, Not a Hunger Problem
You are not hungry and you eat anyway, which means hunger is not the trigger. What the trigger usually is, and where this stops being a habit question.
You are not hungry and you eat anyway, which means hunger is not the trigger. What the trigger usually is, and where this stops being a habit question.
A shared habit has a cue that is another person, and that is the one cue you cannot remove. What changes, what to ask for, and what not to try.
The same person, two places, two sets of behavior. Habits are attached to contexts rather than to people, and there is measured evidence for what that means.
You stopped, and now there is a hole in your evening. That hole is the size of the thing you removed, and something is going to move into it.
The trigger is not boredom, it is the specific gap where boredom arrives. Where those gaps sit in a day, and why removing the behavior widens the gap.
You know you will regret it and you do it anyway, which is the shape of a behavior with a reward attached. What that reward is, and the four ways out.
The delay does not have to defeat you, it has to interrupt you. Where to put friction, why the numbers you have read are invented, and when it stops working.
Removing a behavior leaves a cue with nothing attached to it, and the cue does not go away. What a substitute has to match, and where the idea overreaches.
You cannot redesign a cue you have not found, and you will not find it by thinking about it. A log that takes ten seconds an instance and a week to answer.
You kept it up for a year and then it stopped. Habits are held up by context, not by repetitions banked. Here is how to find the cue that left.